Comparison of the uptake of health assessment items for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and other Australians: Implications for policy

doi:10.1186/1743-8462-2-21

Australia and New Zealand Health Policy

Volume 2

Viewing options:

Abstract
Full text
PDF (240KB)

Associated material:

Related literature:

Articles citing this article
on Google Scholar
on PubMed Central
Other articles by authors
on Google Scholar

Kelaher M
Dunt D
Thomas D
Anderson I

on PubMed

Kelaher M
Dunt D
Thomas D
Anderson I
Related articles/pages
on Google

on Google Scholar

on PubMed

Tools:

Post to:

Research

Comparison of the uptake of health assessment items for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people and other Australians: Implications for policy

Margaret Kelaher¹, David Dunt¹, David Thomas²^,3 and Ian Anderson²^,3

¹Program Evaluation Unit, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Australia

²Onemda VicHealth Koori Health Unit, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Australia

³Centre for Health in Society, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Australia

Australia and New Zealand Health Policy 2005, 2:21doi:10.1186/1743-8462-2-21


Published:	9 September 2005

Abstract

Background

Health Assessment (HA) items were introduced in 1999 for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged at least 55 years and all Australians aged over 75 years. In 2004 a new item was introduced for HAs among adult Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 15–54 years. The new item has been applauded as a major policy innovation however this enthusiasm has been tempered with concern about potential barriers to its uptake. In this study we aim to determine whether there are disparities in uptake of HA items for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people compared to other Australians.

Method

The analysis was based on Health Insurance Commission data. Indigenous status was ascertained based on the item number used. Logistic regression was used to compare uptake of HA items for older people among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people compared to other Australians. Adjustments were made for dual eligibility. Uptake of the HA items for older people was compared to the uptake of the new item for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 15–44 years.

Results

Our analyses suggest a significant and persistent disparity in the uptake of items for older patients among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people compared to other Australians. A similar disparity appears to exist in the uptake of the new adult Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander HA item.

Conclusion

Further engagement of primary care providers and the community around the uptake of the new HA items may be required to ensure that the anticipated health benefits eventuate.