Research

Increasing the options for reducing adverse events: Results from a modified Delphi technique

Jeff Richardson and John McKie

Centre for Health Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia

author email corresponding author email

Australia and New Zealand Health Policy 2008, 5:25doi:10.1186/1743-8462-5-25

Published:	14 November 2008

Abstract

Background

The aim of this paper is to illustrate a simple method for increasing the range of possible options for reducing adverse events in Australian hospitals, which could have been, but was not, adopted in the wake of the landmark 1995 'Quality in Australian Health Care' study, and to report the suggestions and the estimated lapse time before they would impact upon mortality and morbidity.

Method

The study used a modified Delphi technique that first elicited options for reducing adverse events from an invited panel selected on the basis of their knowledge of the area of adverse events and quality assurance. Initial suggestions were collated and returned to them for re-consideration and comment.

Results

Completed responses from both stages were obtained from 20 of those initially approached. Forty-one options for reducing AEs were identified with an average lapse time of 3.5 years. Hospital regulation had the least delay (2.4 years) and out of hospital information the greatest (6.4 years).

Conclusion

Following identification of the magnitude of the problem of adverse events in the 'Quality in Australian Health Care' study a more rapid and broad ranging response was possible than occurred. Apparently viable options for reducing adverse events and associated mortality and morbidity remain unexploited.