Table 2 |
|
|
Number of participants favouring the three allocation principles: Final positions |
|
| Alternative |
No |
|
|
|
| 1. Low cost patients should have priority |
9 |
| 2. Priority should not depend on cost |
15 |
| 3. Only extremely high cost treatments relevant |
15 |
| Unable to choose |
2 |
|
|
|
| Total |
41 |
McKie et al. Australia and New Zealand Health Policy 2009 6:11 doi:10.1186/1743-8462-6-11 |
|
